Last updated: October 2026 · Reading time: about 11 minutes
What this guide covers
- Why the comparison broke down
- The three structural questions that actually matter
- What an MGA is — and why most InsurTechs are one
- Who is regulated for what
- What happens if the firm fails
- What did change for the consumer
- What didn't change
- When to choose which
- How to check any insurer before buying
- FAQ
Why the comparison broke down
The article you were probably expecting to read — "InsurTech is fast and digital, traditional insurance is slow and relies on agents" — was accurate around 2017. It has not been accurate for years.
Two things happened.
First, traditional insurers adopted the same technology. Admiral, Aviva, Direct Line, LV= and Hastings all offer app-based policy management, online claims notification, AI-assisted triage and automated document processing. Some of them launched that technology before the InsurTechs that were supposed to disrupt them.
Second, most InsurTechs are not insurers. Many of the brands marketed as "InsurTechs" — the ones with the polished apps and the direct-to-consumer websites — do not carry your risk. They are Managing General Agents (MGAs): regulated intermediaries that design and distribute policies, but leave the underwriting risk with a licensed insurer behind the scenes.
That last point matters enormously for a policyholder and is almost never explained in consumer articles. When you buy a policy from an MGA, the contract is with the insurer, not the brand on the website. If the MGA goes bust, your claim usually still stands. If the insurer behind it goes bust, your claim goes to the FSCS.
Which is why the comparison the market still runs — InsurTech vs traditional — is the wrong comparison. The comparison that matters is structural.
The three structural questions that actually matter
Before you buy any UK insurance policy, in 2026, you should be able to answer three questions about the firm selling it to you.
| Question | Why it matters | How to find the answer |
|---|---|---|
| Who carries the risk? | This is the firm legally obliged to pay your claim. It is not always the brand you bought from. | Policy schedule, "insurer" section — or the FCA register |
| Who is regulated for what? | An MGA, a broker, an appointed representative and a full-stack insurer are regulated in different ways. | FCA Financial Services Register — search the firm name |
| What happens if they fail? | FSCS protection varies by insurance class and by whether the firm is authorised. | FSCS website — check the specific product |
These three questions cut across the InsurTech/traditional divide. A "traditional" insurer and a "digital" MGA might have the same risk carrier behind them. Two InsurTechs might have completely different structures — one a licensed insurer, one an MGA selling on behalf of someone else.
What an MGA is — and why most InsurTechs are one
A Managing General Agent is a firm authorised by an insurer to underwrite policies on that insurer's behalf. The MGA designs the product, sets the pricing within agreed parameters, handles distribution, and often handles claims — but the insurer carries the risk and holds the regulatory capital.
This is not a loophole or a grey area. It is a legitimate and well-established structure, heavily regulated by the FCA, and used by some of the largest insurance groups in the world as well as by InsurTechs.
The reason most InsurTechs are MGAs is straightforward: becoming a full-stack insurer requires regulatory capital in the tens of millions and a multi-year approval process. Launching as an MGA requires a smaller amount of capital, an insurer willing to provide underwriting capacity, and FCA authorisation — which is faster.
For a policyholder, this has three practical consequences:
- Your contract is with the insurer, not the MGA. The name on the policy schedule is the entity legally obliged to pay claims. That is the name to look up if anything goes wrong.
- The MGA can change insurers. Capacity arrangements are usually multi-year contracts. If the MGA's capacity provider changes, your renewal may come from a different insurer than the previous year. Same brand on the website, different firm carrying the risk.
- The MGA going bust is usually survivable. If the MGA fails, the insurer behind it is still on the hook for claims on policies it underwrote. If the insurer fails, FSCS protection applies.
The reverse is not true: if the insurer fails, the MGA is not on the hook. This is the thing most consumers get wrong — they assume the brand they bought from is the entity that pays the claim, and in an MGA arrangement it is not.
UK examples worth knowing (check current status on the FCA register — structures change):
| Brand | Typical structure | What that means for you |
|---|---|---|
| Marshmallow | MGA — policies underwritten by partner insurers | Contract is with the partner insurer, not Marshmallow |
| Cuvva | MGA — short-term cover via partner insurers | Check the named insurer on each short-term policy |
| ManyPets | MGA — acquired by a larger group in 2023; check current underwriting arrangement | Verify current insurer on the policy schedule |
| Zego | Started as MGA; has held its own regulatory permissions at various stages | Check whether the specific product is underwritten by Zego or a partner |
| Direct Line / Admiral / Aviva | Full-stack insurers | Brand, insurer and regulator are the same group |
Who is regulated for what
UK insurance involves several regulators, each with a different role. For a consumer, what matters is FCA authorisation and, for insurers, PRA authorisation.
The FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) regulates conduct — how firms sell to you, how they handle claims, how they treat complaints. Both insurers and intermediaries (including MGAs and brokers) need FCA authorisation. The FCA's Consumer Duty, which applies to open insurance products since July 2023 and closed products since July 2024, requires firms to demonstrate good outcomes for customers, not just compliant processes.
The PRA (Prudential Regulation Authority) regulates the financial soundness of insurers — their capital reserves, solvency, and ability to pay claims. Only full-stack insurers are PRA-authorised. MGAs are not, because they do not carry the risk.
Appointed representatives are a specific structure where a firm is authorised to sell insurance under the umbrella of a principal firm's FCA authorisation. If you buy through an appointed representative, your regulatory recourse goes through the principal firm. This is worth knowing when comparing small brokers or comparison sites.
What happens if the firm fails
This is where consumer understanding is weakest and where the structural question pays off most.
The Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) protects policyholders if an authorised insurer fails. For insurance, the protection is different from bank deposits — and the difference matters.
| Product type | FSCS protection | Limit |
|---|---|---|
| Compulsory insurance (e.g. motor third-party liability) | Protected in full | No upper limit |
| Non-compulsory insurance (home, travel, pet, motor own-damage) | Protected at a percentage of the claim | No upper limit, but check the percentage on the FSCS site — it has changed over time |
| Bank deposits (for comparison) | Protected in full | £85,000 per person, per firm |
Two practical points flow from this.
First, FSCS protection applies to the insurer, not the MGA. If the MGA fails, the insurer still pays. If the insurer fails, FSCS protection kicks in. This is the answer to the structural question — the entity that matters for FSCS is the one named on your policy schedule.
Second, FSCS protection depends on the firm being authorised. If you buy from an unauthorised firm, protection may not apply. This is another reason to check the FCA register before buying — not just for peace of mind, but because the protection itself depends on it.
What did change for the consumer
None of the above means the InsurTechs changed nothing. They changed a lot — just not the thing their marketing claims to have changed.
Speed of quote. Buying motor insurance took 40 minutes on the phone in 2010. It takes 4 minutes online in 2026. That change was driven by the digital-first entrants and it has been adopted across the market.
Claims notification. Submitting a claim used to mean a phone call during office hours. It now means a photo upload from a phone at the scene. Again, driven by InsurTechs, adopted across the market.
Product design. Usage-based insurance — pay-per-mile, telematics, short-term cover — exists because InsurTechs built it. Some of these products had no equivalent in the traditional market. Our guide to the best usage-based car insurance apps for UK drivers covers how they work, and the guide to telematics insurance for UK young drivers covers the pricing implications.
Speed of decisions. Automated triage and document processing mean decisions that took weeks now take hours in some cases. This cuts both ways — as our guide to what AI actually does to your premium and claim covers, faster processing can also mean faster flagging of legitimate claims.
What didn't change
These things are the same whether you buy from a 200-year-old insurer or a brand founded in 2015:
- The legal structure of insurance. Someone carries your risk. It is either an insurer you can name, or it is not insurance.
- FCA rules. The same Consumer Duty obligations apply. The same complaint process applies. The same Financial Ombudsman Service applies.
- FSCS protection. The same scheme, the same limits, the same dependency on firm authorisation.
- Your obligations under the Insurance Act 2015. The duty of fair presentation of risk. Non-disclosure and misrepresentation rules apply to all insurers equally.
- The importance of reading the policy document. A polished app and a well-designed quote flow tell you nothing about what is excluded. InsurTechs are not better or worse than traditional insurers at exclusions — they are the same.
When to choose which
The honest answer: choose based on coverage and price, not on whether the firm markets itself as InsurTech or traditional. That said, the market does have specialisms, and there are patterns worth knowing.
| Your situation | Where the market is strongest | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Simple motor, price-sensitive, comfortable self-serving online | Digital-first brands and comparison sites | Lowest friction, lowest quotes, adequate cover for straightforward risks |
| Young driver or low-mileage driver | Telematics specialists (some InsurTech, some traditional) | Usage-based pricing is the structural advantage — see the telematics guides linked above |
| High-value home, complex contents, or listed property | Traditional insurers and specialist brokers | Underwriting complexity requires human assessment; standard digital flows often can't handle it |
| Commercial multi-site, professional indemnity, or liability | Brokers, sometimes with InsurTech platforms behind them | Coverage requires expertise; the technology is the mechanism, not the differentiator |
| Short-term cover (days or weeks) | InsurTech specialists (Cuvva and similar) | The product didn't really exist before the digital entrants built it |
| Anyone who needs to understand their policy before buying | Either — but you must read the policy schedule | The brand tells you nothing about your coverage; the schedule tells you everything |
How to check any insurer before buying
Five checks, in this order. It takes about ten minutes total.
- Open the policy schedule or the Key Facts Document. Find the name of the insurer. This is the entity that carries your risk.
- Search that name on the FCA Financial Services Register. Confirm they are authorised and check which permissions they hold.
- Search the brand name too, if different. If you're buying from an MGA, you'll find their permissions listed separately. Confirm the relationship in the register.
- Check FSCS protection on the FSCS website. Confirm the specific product type is protected and at what percentage.
- Read the exclusions section of the policy document. Not the summary — the actual policy. Exclusions are where claims get refused, and no brand on the market is exempt from this.
If any of the first four checks fails, do not buy. If the fifth check is confusing, ask the insurer to explain the specific exclusion in writing before you buy. A firm that cannot do that is telling you something about its claims handling.
For the technical picture of what the insurer is actually doing with your data and your claim once you've bought, see our guide to what AI actually does to your premium and claim.
Frequently asked questions
Is an InsurTech an insurance company?
Usually not. Many InsurTechs are MGAs — regulated intermediaries that design and sell policies underwritten by a partner insurer. Your contract is with the insurer named on the policy schedule, not the brand on the website. Some InsurTechs do hold their own insurer authorisation, so the only reliable way to know is to check the policy schedule and the FCA register.
Is digital insurance better than traditional insurance?
Neither is inherently better. What matters is coverage, price, exclusions, and the structure behind the brand. Many traditional insurers now offer the same digital experience as the InsurTechs, and some InsurTechs are simply MGAs selling policies underwritten by traditional insurers.
Who is the insurer if I buy from an InsurTech MGA?
The partner insurer named on your policy schedule. When the MGA places your policy, the contract is between you and the insurer, not the MGA. If you need to know who to complain to or who pays your claim, the policy schedule names them.
Is my money safe if an InsurTech goes bust?
In most cases, yes. If the MGA fails, the insurer behind it is still on the hook for claims on policies it underwrote. If the insurer fails, FSCS protection applies — at 100% for compulsory insurance like motor third-party liability, and at a percentage of the claim for non-compulsory insurance. Always verify the specifics on the FSCS website.
How do I know if my insurer is FCA authorised?
Search the firm name on the FCA Financial Services Register at register.fca.org.uk. Both insurers and intermediaries (including MGAs and brokers) must be authorised. Appointed representatives are listed separately under their principal firm.
Do InsurTechs offer cheaper insurance?
Sometimes, but not because they are InsurTechs. Price depends on your risk profile, the cover level, the insurer behind the policy, and the broker's commission. The same policy underwritten by the same insurer can be priced differently through two different MGAs or comparison sites.
Does the FCA Consumer Duty apply to InsurTechs the same way as traditional insurers?
Yes. The Consumer Duty applies to all FCA-authorised firms in scope, including MGAs, insurers and brokers. An algorithmic outcome is not treated as automatically fair simply because the model behaved as designed.
What is the difference between an MGA and a broker?
An MGA underwriting on behalf of an insurer — it designs policies and may set pricing within agreed parameters. A broker does not underwrite: it places your policy with an insurer and may act as your representative. Both are FCA-regulated, but the MGA is closer to the insurer, and the broker is closer to you.
Related reading on Dedon Tech: AI in insurance: what it actually does to your premium and claim · best usage-based car insurance apps for UK drivers · best telematics car insurance for UK young drivers · full site map

0 Comments: